Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779749›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

One health assessment of farmers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) on zoonoses in Bangladesh.

Md Jisan Ahmed, Md Ismile Hossain Bhuiyan, Ritu Chalise, Mustakim Mamun, Prajwal Bhandari, Khairul Islam, Shahrin Sultana Jami, Mahabbat Ali, Mirza Synthia Sabrin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rift Valley fever and invisible women.Research directions. One health · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Md Jisan AhmedAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh. jisan.path1506605@sau.edu.bd.
Md Ismile Hossain BhuiyanAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Ritu ChaliseAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Mustakim MamunAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Prajwal BhandariAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Khairul IslamDepartment of Animal Production and Management, Faculty of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Shahrin Sultana JamiAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Mahabbat AliAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Mirza Synthia SabrinAssociation of Coding, Technology, and Genomics (ACTG), Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University (SAU), Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Bangladesh, farming serves as a key livelihood, leading to a higher risk of zoonotic diseases due to frequent animal interactions and traditional practices. The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of livestock farmers regarding zoonotic disease outbreaks. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 658 livestock farmers from randomly selected regions in Bangladesh from April to June 2024. The participants included farmers with at least two livestock animals and ten or more birds on their farms. Among livestock farmers, 89.06% were male, mostly aged 30-45, but predominantly from non-science educational backgrounds. The survey revealed significant knowledge and practice gaps regarding zoonosis, with only 11.55% possessing good knowledge and 37.54% demonstrating good practices. Farmers with a science education had higher KAP scores. Most avoided consuming raw animal products, although 23% lived in close proximity to animals. Logistic regression identified factors influencing KAP, including rearing systems, farming experience, pet ownership, and biosecurity training. The study found that farmers lack adequate knowledge and practices regarding zoonosis, despite exhibiting a positive attitude. The study emphasizes the need for targeted educational programs and a collaborative One Health approach to improve zoonotic disease control, particularly among less educated farmers, to enhance public health and economic outcomes.

Indexed as

FarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOne HealthZoonosesAdultAnimalsBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLivestockMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBangladeshKAPsLivestock farmersPoultry farmersZoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID39779749
PMCPMC11711284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.