Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Biochar filtration of drug-resistant bacteria and active pharmaceutical ingredients to combat antimicrobial resistance.

Paul-Enguerrand Fady, Alexandra K Richardson, Leon P Barron, A James Mason, Roberto Volpe, Meredith R Barr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pyrolysis temperature shapes the structure and filtration capacity of spent-coffee-ground biochar for 1-μm microplastics and bacteria removal from wastewater.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul-Enguerrand FadyInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Alexandra K RichardsonMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 86 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
Leon P BarronMRC Centre for Environment and Health, Environmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, 86 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.
A James MasonInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Roberto VolpeSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Meredith R BarrSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. meredith.barr@lsbu.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009513/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major cause of death worldwide, with 1.27 M direct deaths from bacterial drug-resistant infections as of 2019. Dissemination of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in the environment, in conjunction with pharmapollution by active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), create and foster an environmental reservoir of AMR. Creative solutions are required to mitigate environmental AMR, while taking into consideration other aspects of the planetary "Triple Crisis" of pollution, biodiversity loss, and climate change. Waste lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), a byproduct of agriculture and forestry, is the largest stream of non-edible biomass globally. Through pyrolysis, waste LCB can be converted into biochars, which have excellent attributes for adsorption of pollutants-though no studies have yet reliably correlated production conditions with efficacy, nor considered adsorption of human pathogens. By leveraging a bespoke pyrolysis reactor with precisely controlled parameters, we show that production conditions substantially affect sequestration of clinical bacterial isolates, removing up to 94% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RP73 and 85% of Staphylococcus aureus EMRSA-15. In addition, we show that chars produced at higher peak pyrolysis temperatures (450 °C) can remove up to 88% of the antibiotic clarithromycin from wastewater, as well as significant proportions of many other APIs with varied physicochemical characteristics. These findings provide a first-in-kind insight into how production conditions affect the ability of biochars to mitigate environmental AMR.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCharcoalFiltrationPseudomonas aeruginosaBiomassBulk DrugsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansPyrolysisStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsbiocharBulk DrugsCharcoalAdsorptionHuman pathogensMorphologyPharmapollutionPyrolysisWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID39779747
PMCPMC11711200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.