ArticleScientific reports2025
Balancing fairness and efficiency in dynamic vaccine allocation during major infectious disease outbreaks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fairness-based techniques to optimize vaccine allocation among migrants during pandemics: a scoping review.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Competition Law and Ethics of Innovation as Catalysts for Fairness: Reimagining the EU's COVID-19 Vaccine Strategy.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The outbreak of novel infectious diseases presents major public health challenges, highlighting the urgency of accelerating vaccination efforts to reduce morbidity and mortality. Vaccine allocation has become a crucial societal concern. This paper introduces a dynamic vaccine allocation model that considers demand uncertainty and vaccination willingness, focusing on the trade-off between fairness and efficiency. We develop a multi-period dynamic vaccine allocation model, evaluating optimal strategies over different periods. The model addresses structural differences among vaccination groups, strategy selection, dynamic demand, and vaccination willingness. Our findings suggest that prioritizing efficiency in the initial outbreak stages may lead to inequitable distribution, causing adverse social impacts, while overemphasizing fairness can undermine overall utility. Therefore, we propose a dynamic optimization-based strategy balancing fairness and efficiency at different pandemic stages. Our results indicate that allocation strategies should shift from efficiency to fairness as the pandemic evolves to enhance vaccine utility. Additionally, macro-level interventions like reducing free-rider behavior and increasing vaccination convenience can improve total vaccine utility. This study offers new perspectives and methodologies for dynamic vaccine allocation, highlighting the trade-off between fairness and efficiency, providing crucial insights for policy formulation and pandemic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.