ArticleScientific reports2025
Observer- and sequence variability in personalized 4D flow MRI-based cardiovascular models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive CMR evaluation including 4D flow-derived E/A vorticity ratio in overweight adults with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Trial
- Splanchnic flow analysis in 4D flow MRI: scan-rescan reproducibility of flow and image quality.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subject-specific parameters in lumped hemodynamic models of the cardiovascular system can be estimated using data from experimental measurements, but the parameter estimation may be hampered by the variability in the input data. In this study, we investigate the influence of inter-sequence, intra-observer, and inter-observer variability in input parameters on estimation of subject-specific model parameters using a previously developed approach for model-based analysis of data from 4D Flow MRI acquisitions and cuff pressure measurements. The investigated parameters describe left ventricular time-varying elastance and aortic compliance. Parameter reproducibility with respect to variability in the MRI input measurements was assessed in a group of ten healthy subjects. The subject-specific parameters had coefficient of variations between 2.6 and 35% in the intra- and inter-observer analysis. In comparing parameters estimated using data from the two MRI sequences, the coefficients of variation ranged between 3.3 and 41%. The diastolic time constant of the left ventricle and the compliance of the ascending aorta were the parameters with the lowest and the highest variability, respectively. In conclusion, the modeling approach allows for estimating left ventricular elastance parameters and aortic compliance from non-invasive measurements with good to moderate reproducibility concerning intra-user, inter-user, and inter-sequence variability in healthy subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.