Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779687›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025

Auditory evoked-potential abnormalities in a mouse model of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and their interactions with hearing impairment.

Chen Lu, Jennifer F Linden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chen LuEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Jennifer F LindenEar Institute, University College London, London, UK. j.linden@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2210-1374

Funding

RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/P006221/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 22q11.2 deletion is a risk factor for multiple psychiatric disorders including schizophrenia and also increases vulnerability to middle-ear problems that can cause hearing impairment. Up to 60% of deletion carriers experience hearing impairment and ~30% develop schizophrenia in adulthood. It is not known if these risks interact. Here we used the Df1/+ mouse model of the 22q11.2 deletion to investigate how hearing impairment might interact with increased genetic vulnerability to psychiatric disease to affect brain function. We measured brain function using cortical auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), which are commonly measured non-invasively in humans. After identifying one of the simplest and best-validated methods for AEP measurement in mice from the diversity of previous approaches, we measured peripheral hearing sensitivity and cortical AEPs in Df1/+ mice and their WT littermates. We exploited large inter-individual variation in hearing ability among Df1/+ mice to distinguish effects of genetic background from effects of hearing impairment. Central auditory gain and adaptation were quantified by comparing brainstem activity and cortical AEPs and by analyzing the growth of cortical AEPs with increasing sound level or inter-tone interval duration. We found that level-dependent AEP growth was abnormally large in Df1/+ mice regardless of hearing impairment, but other AEP measures of central auditory gain and adaptation depended on both genotype and hearing phenotype. Our results demonstrate the relevance of comorbid hearing loss to auditory brain dysfunction in 22q11.2DS and also identify potential biomarkers for psychiatric disease that are robust to hearing impairment.

Indexed as

DiGeorge SyndromeDisease Models, AnimalEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHearing LossAnimalsAuditory CortexFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID39779687
PMCPMC11711659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.