ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
Only Children by Choice vs. Only Children by Circumstances: Why Do Some Women Have Only One Child?
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an attempt to stimulate further theory and research on only children, we introduce two conceptual distinctions: Only children as independent variables vs. only children as dependent variables; and only children by choice vs. only children by circumstances. What little scientific research exists on only children to date focuses almost exclusively on only children as independent variables and fails to make a distinction between only children by choice and only children by circumstances. A focus on only children by choice as dependent variables explores the question of why some women choose to have only one child. As an empirical illustration, analyses of prospectively longitudinal data with a nationally representative sample in the United Kingdom (National Child Development Study) show that women who experience pregnancy complications are significantly less likely to have another child and significantly more likely to have only one child. Our results suggest that increased chances of pregnancy complications that American women now experience alone can explain about 10% of the increase in the number of only children in the United States in the last half century. If certain genes incline women to have pregnancy complications, it is possible that only children by circumstances are genetically more similar to children with siblings than to only children by choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39779646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.