Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779645›Full record

SynthesisMedical & biological engineering & computing2025

Systematic review of computational techniques, dataset utilization, and feature extraction in electrocardiographic imaging.

Dagoberto Mayorca-Torres, Alejandro J León-Salas, Diego H Peluffo-Ordoñez

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dagoberto Mayorca-TorresDepartment of Software Systems and Programming Languages, Universidad de Granada, C/Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda s/n, Granada, 18071, Spain. dago.mayorca.torres@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4342-0238
Alejandro J León-SalasDepartment of Software Systems and Programming Languages, Universidad de Granada, C/Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda s/n, Granada, 18071, Spain.
Diego H Peluffo-Ordoñez *Faculty of Engineering, Corporación Universitaria Autónoma de Nariño, Pasto, 520001, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze computational techniques in ECG imaging (ECGI) reconstruction, focusing on dataset identification, problem-solving, and feature extraction. We employed a PRISMA approach to review studies from Scopus and Web of Science, applying Cochrane principles to assess risk of bias. The selection was limited to English peer-reviewed papers published from 2010 to 2023, excluding studies that lacked computational technique descriptions. From 99 reviewed papers, trends show a preference for traditional methods like the boundary element and Tikhonov methods, alongside a rising use of advanced technologies including hybrid techniques and deep learning. These advancements have enhanced cardiac diagnosis and treatment precision. Our findings underscore the need for robust data utilization and innovative computational integration in ECGI, highlighting promising areas for future research and advances. This shift toward tailored cardiac care suggests significant progress in diagnostic and treatment methods.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningHumansComputational techniquesECG imagingRegularization methodsSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.