ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Multi-Class Brain Tumor Grades Classification Using a Deep Learning-Based Majority Voting Algorithm and Its Validation Using Explainable-AI.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bridging modalities: a deep learning framework for brain tumor classification via CT-MRI integration and model fusion.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Majority Voting Ensemble of Deep CNNs for Robust MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing brain tumors, but its invasive nature can pose risks to patients. Additionally, tissue analysis can be cumbersome and inconsistent among observers. This research aims to develop a cost-effective, non-invasive, MRI-based computer-aided diagnosis tool that can reliably, accurately and swiftly identify brain tumor grades. Our system employs ensemble deep learning (EDL) within an MRI multiclass framework that includes five datasets: two-class (C2), three-class (C3), four-class (C4), five-class (C5) and six-class (C6). The EDL utilizes a majority voting algorithm to classify brain tumors by combining seven renowned deep learning (DL) models-EfficientNet, VGG16, ResNet18, GoogleNet, ResNet50, Inception-V3 and DarkNet-and seven machine learning (ML) models, including support vector machine, K-nearest neighbour, Naïve Bayes, decision tree, linear discriminant analysis, artificial neural network and random forest. Additionally, local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) are employed as an explainable AI algorithm, providing a visual representation of the CNN's internal workings to enhance the credibility of the results. Through extensive five-fold cross-validation experiments, the DL-based majority voting algorithm outperformed the ML-based majority voting algorithm, achieving the highest average accuracies of 100 ± 0.00%, 98.55 ± 0.35%, 98.47 ± 0.63%, 95.34 ± 1.17% and 96.61 ± 0.85% for the C2, C3, C4, C5 and C6 datasets, respectively. Majority voting algorithms typically yield consistent results across different folds of the brain tumor data and enhance performance compared to any individual deep learning and machine learning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.