ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Morphometric analysis of the C1-2 zygapophysial joint in atlantoaxial dislocation patients with sandwich fusion of the craniovertebral junction.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combination of congenital C1 occipitalization and C2-3 non-segmentation (i.e. "sandwich fusion") results in early development of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). A thorough understanding of the morphometry of the C1-2 zygapophysial joints is important to ensure a safe surgery. This study was aimed to evaluate the C1-2 zygapophysial joint in AAD patients with sandwich fusion by morphological research based on CT scans. This was a retrospective case-control study including 155 AAD patients with sandwich fusion in sandwich group and 55 with os odontoideum (OO) in control group. The C1 listhetic distance, sagittal inclination angle (SIA), coronal inclination angles (CIA) were measured from the CT and compared between two groups. The listhetic grade was defined according to the ratio of the listhetic distance and length of the superior facet of C2: less than 25% as mild, 25-75% as moderate, and greater than 75% as severe. Patients in the sandwich group had higher listhetic grade than the OO group (17.4% vs. 70.6%, 50.3% vs. 29.4% and 32.3% vs. 0 were of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively). The SIA and CIA in the sandwich group were greater than those in the OO group (30.1° vs. 5.0°, 36.6° vs. 31.0°, respectively). Asymmetric listhesis was found in 0.0%, 63.3%, and 85.7% of sandwich patients with mild, moderate and severe listhetic grade, respectively. AAD with sandwich fusion was a three-dimensional deformity characterized by the high prevalence of asymmetric and moderate-to-severe listhesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39779527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.