Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779518›Full record

Observational studyPediatric cardiology2026

Preoperative Oral Feeding in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease Within the First Month of Life is Associated with a Higher Likelihood of Freedom From Tube Feeding at Time of Postoperative Discharge.

Aseel Dabbagh, Sarah Miller, Michael McCulloch, Geoffrey Rosenthal, Mark Conaway, Shelby White

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Human milk and breastfeeding at the first oral feed for infants with critical congenital heart disease: a multi-institutional study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aseel DabbaghDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA. aseel.dabbagh@gmail.com.
Sarah MillerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Michael McCullochDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Geoffrey RosenthalDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Mark ConawayDivision of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Shelby WhiteDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though several studies have demonstrated that preoperative oral feeding (PO) can be safe in patients with congenital heart disease, they are commonly prohibited from doing so, potentially precluding the development of such skills. We sought to determine whether preoperative oral feeding is associated with freedom from tube feeding at postoperative discharge. Single-center, observational study including patients in the first month of life (≤ 30 days of age) who underwent a single cardiac surgery between 7/1/2017-6/30/2022 and survived to discharge. Preoperative PO was defined as any oral intake up to the day of cardiac surgery. General demographics and peri-operative characteristics were analyzed. A total of 235 patients were included of which 178 (78%) PO fed preoperatively, and 171 (73%) were discharged taking full PO. Those discharged without tube feeds received more preoperative oral feeds, were less likely to have a chromosomal abnormality/genetic syndrome, had lower STAT categories, and were less likely to have postoperative complications, vocal cord dysfunction or prolonged mechanical ventilation. Multivariate analysis found that any preoperative PO [odds ratio (OR) of 2.78 (CI 1.48, 5.24, p-value = 0.002)] and increasing amounts of PO were predictive of full PO intake at discharge [≤ 20 ml/kg/day (OR 2.06, CI 1.03, 4.14, p-value = 0.042) and > 20 ml/kg/day (OR 4.07, CI 1.88, 8.84, p-value = 0.004)]. Preoperative oral feeding is a strong predictor of discharging with full PO intake after cardiac surgery in the first month of life and that it may also improve with increasing volumes. Multi-institutional analyses are warranted.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresEnteral NutritionHeart Defects, CongenitalPreoperative CareFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesCongenital heart diseaseFeeding tubeNeonatesOral feeding

Identifiers

PMID39779518
PMCPMC12827393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.