Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779511›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Mapping simulated visual field defects with movie-viewing pupil perimetry.

Yuqing Cai, Christoph Strauch, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Antonia F Ten Brink, Frans W Cornelissen, Marnix Naber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuqing CaiExperimental Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christoph StrauchExperimental Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan Van der StigchelExperimental Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Antonia F Ten BrinkExperimental Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frans W CornelissenLaboratory for Experimental Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Marnix NaberExperimental Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.naber@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4208-8437

Funding

Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging ter voorkoming van Blindheid UZ-2023-18Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek 406.XS.04.127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAssessing the quality of the visual field is important for the diagnosis of ophthalmic and neurological diseases and, consequently, for rehabilitation. Visual field defects (VFDs) are typically assessed using standard automated perimetry (SAP). However, SAP requires participants to understand instructions, maintain fixation and sustained attention, and provide overt responses. These aspects make SAP less suitable for very young or cognitively impaired populations. Here we investigate the feasibility of a new and less demanding form of perimetry. This method assesses visual sensitivity based on pupil responses while performing the perhaps simplest task imaginable: watching movies.

methodWe analyzed an existing dataset, with healthy participants (n = 70) freely watching movies with or without gaze-contingent simulated VFDs, either hemianopia (left- or right-sided) or glaucoma (large nasal arc, small nasal arc, and tunnel vision). Meanwhile, their gaze and pupil size were recorded. Using a recently published toolbox (Open-DPSM), we modeled the relative contribution of visual events to the pupil responses to indicate relative visual sensitivity across the visual field and to dissociate between conditions with and without simulated VFDs.

resultConditions with and without simulated VFDs could be dissociated, with an AUC ranging from 0.85 to 0.97, depending on the specific simulated VFD condition. In addition, the dissociation was better when including more movies in the modeling but the model with as few movies as 10 movies was sufficient for a good classification (AUC ranging from 0.84 to 0.96).

conclusionMovie-viewing pupil perimetry is promising in providing complementary information for the diagnosis of VFDs, especially for those who are unable to perform conventional perimetry.

Indexed as

HemianopsiaMotion PicturesPupilVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdultFemaleGlaucomaHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultGlaucomaHemianopiaModeling pupil sizePupil perimetrySimulated visual field defects

Identifiers

PMID39779511
PMCPMC12238215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.