ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Surgical Experience and Outcome Evaluation of Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery for Transgender Female in China: A Case Series.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGender-affirming surgery (GAS) for transgender females developed relatively late and limited in China due to some reasons. To introduce GAS surgical experiences for Chinese transgender females is necessary.
aimsTo report surgical choices and experience including clitoral/urethral reconstruction, vaginoplasty, and vulvoplasty, and their outcomes.
methodsA single-center, retrospective case series was conducted among transgender females who underwent GAS between September 2018 and March 2023. Surgical outcomes were evaluated including short-term and long-term complications. Scar-Q Scale, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Amsterdam Hyperactive Pelvic Floor Scale-Women (AHPFS-W), and Female Genital Self-Imaging Scale (FGSIS) were carried out for outcome evaluation.
resultsThirteen transgender females underwent GAS. Among them, 7 patients underwent sigmoid colon vaginoplasty, 3 patients underwent zero-depth vaginoplasty (ZDV), and 3 patients underwent vaginoplasty using skin flap (penile or scrotum). Postoperative follow-up showed that for sigmoid colon neo-vagina, vaginal length can reach 10-15 cm, with a width of about 2 fingers. For skin flap neo-vagina, the long-term vaginal length can maintain at around 8-10 cm, with a width of about 2 fingers. AHPFS-W outcome shows that patients undergoing sigmoid colon vaginoplasty and ZDV have relatively better pelvic floor muscle function. Patients undergoing skin flap vaginoplasty scored higher on the FGSIS, indicating a higher level of self-acceptance toward reconstructed genitalia. DISCUSSION: Factors like anatomical characteristics, sexual customs and cultural backgrounds may alter the choice of GAS techniques for Chinese transgender females. The GAS surgical experience specialized to Chinese transgender females is necessary to share. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
39779504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.