Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779497›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Economic evaluation of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: A systematic review.

Hiroki Saito, Kotomi Sakai, Motoko Tanaka, Keiko Konomura, Mitsuyoshi Suzuki, Go Tajima, Eri Hoshino

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiroki SaitoDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kotomi SakaiDepartment of Research, Heisei Medical Welfare Group Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoko TanakaDepartment of Health Policy, Research Institute, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko KonomuraCenter for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, Saitama, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Go TajimaDivision of Neonatal Screening, Research Institute, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Eri HoshinoDivision of Policy Evaluation, Department of Health Policy, Research Institute, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan. hoshino-e@ncchd.go.jp.

Funding

Children and Families Agency, Government of Japan 23DA0801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis systematic review analyzes economic evaluations of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection to identify key factors influencing cost-effectiveness and differences in methodological approaches.

methodsFollowing a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023441587), we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases on July 4, 2024. The review included both full economic evaluations (cost and outcomes) and partial economic evaluations (cost only). Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and synthesis. Quality assessment used the Consensus Health Economic Criteria extended checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement.

resultsFrom 543 records, nine studies met inclusion criteria: four full and five partial economic evaluations. Two full economic evaluations provided the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year. Full economic evaluations using decision trees and Markov models generally found universal screening more cost-effective than targeted screening, despite higher incremental costs. Partial evaluations focused on direct costs, with varying inclusion of long-term care costs. Most studies adopted a healthcare system perspective, excluding indirect costs. Quality assessment of full economic evaluations revealed high methodological standards but identified common limitations in outcome measurement and reporting.

conclusionsAvailable evidence suggests potential cost-effectiveness of newborn cCMV screening, particularly with early intervention strategies. However, limited full economic evaluations and heterogeneous methodological approaches preclude definitive conclusions, highlighting the need for additional research across diverse healthcare contexts. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a condition that can be detected through newborn screening, and understanding its economic implications is important for healthcare systems. • Economic evaluations can be categorized into full evaluations (analyzing both costs and outcomes) and partial evaluations (focusing only on costs). WHAT IS NEW: • Based on a systematic review of 543 records, universal screening appears more cost-effective than targeted screening for cCMV, implementation challenges and healthcare system variations significantly impact its practical adoption. • The review identified significant methodological limitations in existing studies, particularly in outcome measurement and reporting, highlighting the need for more comprehensive research across different healthcare contexts.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCytomegalovirus InfectionsNeonatal ScreeningHumansInfant, NewbornQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCongenital cytomegalovirus infectionCost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationScreening

Identifiers

PMID39779497
PMCPMC11711639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.