SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Economic evaluation of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: A systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Hearing Screening-Driven Investigation of Newborns for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection at a German University Hospital.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Retrospective screening for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in the Survey of Neonates in Pomerania shows very low disease burden.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Article
- Current status of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus disease: a call to action.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) Infection as a Leading Cause of Pediatric Hearing Loss: Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis systematic review analyzes economic evaluations of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection to identify key factors influencing cost-effectiveness and differences in methodological approaches.
methodsFollowing a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023441587), we conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases on July 4, 2024. The review included both full economic evaluations (cost and outcomes) and partial economic evaluations (cost only). Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and synthesis. Quality assessment used the Consensus Health Economic Criteria extended checklist and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement.
resultsFrom 543 records, nine studies met inclusion criteria: four full and five partial economic evaluations. Two full economic evaluations provided the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year. Full economic evaluations using decision trees and Markov models generally found universal screening more cost-effective than targeted screening, despite higher incremental costs. Partial evaluations focused on direct costs, with varying inclusion of long-term care costs. Most studies adopted a healthcare system perspective, excluding indirect costs. Quality assessment of full economic evaluations revealed high methodological standards but identified common limitations in outcome measurement and reporting.
conclusionsAvailable evidence suggests potential cost-effectiveness of newborn cCMV screening, particularly with early intervention strategies. However, limited full economic evaluations and heterogeneous methodological approaches preclude definitive conclusions, highlighting the need for additional research across diverse healthcare contexts. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a condition that can be detected through newborn screening, and understanding its economic implications is important for healthcare systems. • Economic evaluations can be categorized into full evaluations (analyzing both costs and outcomes) and partial evaluations (focusing only on costs). WHAT IS NEW: • Based on a systematic review of 543 records, universal screening appears more cost-effective than targeted screening for cCMV, implementation challenges and healthcare system variations significantly impact its practical adoption. • The review identified significant methodological limitations in existing studies, particularly in outcome measurement and reporting, highlighting the need for more comprehensive research across different healthcare contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.