ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
When and how are complications suspected after shunt surgery in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus?
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Outcomes and Efficacy of Programmable Versus Nonprogrammable Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts in the Management of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Retrospective Study.Neurology research international · 2026Article
- Different methods of cerebrospinal fluid diversion in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical neurology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe follow-up routine for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) after shunt surgery differs across medical centers. Shunt surgery is not without risks, with complications emerging at various times after the procedure. The aim was to explore the timing and methods of detecting complications following ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for iNPH.
methodsThis retrospective study examined patients who underwent shunt surgery for iNPH at Uppsala University Hospital between 2011 and 2018. The cohort comprised 491 patients. Postoperative complications within the first 12 months were recorded from medical records. Complications were classified by type, and the method or event that first indicated the complication was documented.
resultsOf the 491 patients, 102 (20.8%) experienced complications during the one-year follow-up period, with a shunt revision rate of 15.5% (76 patients requiring reoperation). Subdural hematomas/hygromas were the most common complications, with 27 cases; only three required surgical intervention. Most complications were identified through additional appointments triggered by patient-reported symptoms (31.4%), while the planned follow-up routine with CT scans and planned follow-up visits together accounted for 56% of the detections. The 3-month and 12-month follow-up visits detected similar proportions of complications (12.7% and 11.8%, respectively).
conclusionThe majority of the complications were detected at a planned visit or investigation. Given the cognitive impairments in iNPH patients and that signs of shunt dysfunction can be subtle, a structured follow-up routine is important for timely detection of complications. The findings suggest that both CT scans and planned follow-up visits are critical components of effective postoperative monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.