Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39779266›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Application of core functions and forms in complex health intervention research: a scoping review protocol.

Katelyn Fox, Debbie Passey, Eunyoung Kang, Laura Zeigen, Erin Kenzie, Jessica D Austin, Rachel J Meadows, Maria E Fernandez, Monica Perez Jolles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Modifications of a Parenting Program in the Context of Scaling-Up and Scaling-Out: Documenting Furaha Teens in Tanzania Using FRAME.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katelyn FoxWeight Control and Diabetes Research Center, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA katelyn_fox@brown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9790-6014
Debbie PasseyDepartment of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eunyoung KangInstitue for Implementation Science, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7657-9221
Laura ZeigenOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-0565
Erin KenzieOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jessica D AustinDepartment of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Sciences, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8286-7801
Rachel J MeadowsJPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Maria E FernandezInstitue for Implementation Science, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, USA.
Monica Perez JollesAdult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7855-456X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ability of healthcare, community and public health systems to effectively implement and disseminate research innovations depends on contextual factors at multiple interconnected levels of influence (eg, the innovation, individual, provider/implementor, organisation and health system). Recently, there has been an increase in the development of complex interventions designed to target multiple levels, designed for or adapted to the context in which they are delivered. Two concepts from complex systems thinking have been increasingly used to operationalise such interventions-core functions (theory and evidence-driven purposes of interventions) and forms (adaptable activities that perform each core function). However, there is a gap in the literature regarding how these concepts are being applied in intervention design and evaluation and implementation strategies. To fill this gap and advance understanding of complex health interventions, this scoping review will:Identify how functions and forms are defined and operationalised across complex health implementation research studies.Describe methodological approaches to identify or apply the concepts of core functions and forms to the design and evaluation of complex health interventions and implementation strategies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the methodological approach of Arksey and O'Malley. The search strategy will include electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) and reference lists and citations of exemplar papers in the field. The literature search will be designed to capture research applying the concepts of core functions and forms in healthcare and public health complex interventions. The search will be restricted to studies published in English in peer-reviewed academic journals. Two coders will screen study titles and abstracts, followed by full-text reviews. One researcher will extract the data and a second will review it for any omissions or errors. An inductive content analysis will be used to categorise the nature of how studies define and operationalise core functions and forms. The scope of the work in this area and methodology (eg, measures selection and analytic approaches) will be described narratively. Results will be presented to experts in the field and their input will be used to further contextualise the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project does not require ethics approval. We will share the findings and data results will be shared via peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YQFP7.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchResearch DesignDelivery of Health CareHumansPublic HealthScoping Reviews as TopicHealth ServicesImplementation SciencePUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39779266
PMCPMC11749525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.