ArticleBMJ open2025
Gastric cancer liver metastases in China: a real-world, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06493448 (Prospective Observational Study of Gastric Cancer Synchronous Liver Metastases), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Observational Study of Gastric Cancer Synchronous Liver Metastases: a Multi-centre, Noninterventional, Cohort Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CEBPB-Regulated Gastric Cell Plasticity Promotes Liver Metastasis of Gastric Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis. The multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment model is applied throughout the entire treatment process. In addition to the previous RECORD study, which was based on the C-GCLM classification system developed by our team, there is a lack of recent data on patient baseline characteristics, clinical treatment and efficacy evaluation. A large-scale prospective observational study is necessary to determine the current situation of GCLM treatment in China. The findings of this study may inform the development of relevant healthcare policies, clinical pathways and treatment guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, non-interventional, observational, multicentre, real-world study designed to monitor the general condition, treatment pattern and prognosis of patients with GCLM. Patients with GCLM were classified into three distinct categories: type I (resectable type), type II (potentially resectable type) and type III (unresectable type). The patients' general information, medical history, imaging results, laboratory tests, surgical and systemic therapy details will be recorded and subjected to analysis. The 2-year overall survival (OS) will be recorded as the primary endpoint. The different therapeutic modalities employed in the treatment of GCLM, including surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, will be recorded as secondary endpoints. Additionally, the effects of these therapies on prognosis, including OS of type I, II and III; R0 resection and disease-free survival of type I; and successful conversion rate and R0 resection rate and event-free survival of type II will be documented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (no. S2023-724-02) and will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Study findings will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journal articles as well as public, academic presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT06493448; ChiCTR2400083955.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.