Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39778917›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2025

Predictive Value of Machine Learning Models for Cerebral Edema Risk in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Qi Deng, Yu Yang, Hongyu Bai, Fei Li, Wenluo Zhang, Rong He, Yuming Li

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi DengDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Kanghui Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0607-6675
Yu YangDepartment of Respiratory, Tianjin Kanghui Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hongyu BaiDepartment of General Surgery, Tianjin Kanghui Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Fei LiDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Kanghui Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wenluo ZhangDepartment of Neurology, PKUCare Rehabilitation Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rong HeDepartment of Neurology, PKUCare Rehabilitation Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuming LiDepartment of Neurology, Tianjin Kanghui Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStroke patients are at high risk of developing cerebral edema, which can have severe consequences. However, there are currently few effective tools for early identification or prediction of this risk. As machine learning (ML) is increasingly used in clinical practice, its effectiveness in predicting cerebral edema risk in stroke patients has been explored. Nonetheless, the lack of systematic evidence on its predictive value challenges the update of simple and user-friendly risk assessment tools. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the predictive utility of ML for cerebral edema in stroke patients.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database up to February 21, 2024. The risk of bias in selected studies was assessed using a bias assessment tool for predictive models. Meta-analysis synthesized results from validation sets.

resultsWe included 22 studies with 25,096 stroke patients and 25 models, which were constructed using common and interpretable clinical features. In the validation cohort, the models achieved a concordance index (c-index) of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.810-0.871) for predicting poststroke cerebral edema, with a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79) and a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.90).

conclusionML models are significant in predicting poststroke cerebral edema, providing clinicians with a powerful prognostic tool. However, radiomics-based research was not included. We anticipate advancements in radiomics research to enhance the predictive power of ML for poststroke cerebral edema.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaMachine LearningStrokeHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk Assessmentcerebral edemamachine learningpredictive modelingstroke

Identifiers

PMID39778917
PMCPMC11710891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.