Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39778881›Full record

Trial reportGut and liver2025

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Tapered-Tip Sheath System for Biliary-Lesion Tissue Sampling: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hirokazu Okada, Norimitsu Uza, Tomoaki Matsumori, Hajime Yamazaki, Muneji Yasuda, Takeshi Kuwada, Yoshihiro Nishikawa, Takahisa Maruno, Masahiro Shiokawa, Atsushi Takai and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Hirokazu OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4712-863X
Norimitsu UzaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-5740
Tomoaki MatsumoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1220-6546
Hajime YamazakiSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9034-4370
Muneji YasudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2747-3257
Takeshi KuwadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9808-4139
Yoshihiro NishikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1113-6937
Takahisa MarunoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7060-4104
Masahiro ShiokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-3888
Atsushi TakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-4120
Ken TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9443-9564
Akihisa FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1940-596X
Etsuro HatanoDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3407-1918
Sachiko MinamiguchiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5800-6769
Hiroshi SenoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8509-8128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Pathological evaluation is crucial for diagnosing biliary lesions and determining appropriate treatment strategies. However, tissue sampling via the transpapillary route can be difficult. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel tapered-tip sheath system for tissue sampling from biliary strictures. Methods: This single-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial included patients aged 20 to 85 years admitted to Kyoto University Hospital for biliary strictures. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to a new or conventional method group. The primary outcome was technical success of biopsy at the target bile duct using the assigned method, as determined in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Adverse events were assessed in all eligible patients. Results: Fifty-six patients were assessed for eligibility between September 2020 and March 2023; 50 patients were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into the new (n=25) method group and the conventional (n=25) method group. Technical success was achieved in 96.0% (24/25) and 48.0% (12/25) of patients in the new and conventional method groups, respectively (risk ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32 to 3.03; risk difference, 48.0%; 95% CI, 27.0% to 69.0%; p<0.001). Adverse events occurred in 4.0% (1/25) and 36.0% (9/25) of patients in the new and conventional method groups, respectively (risk ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.81; risk difference, -32.0%; 95% CI, -52.3% to -11.7%; p=0.005). Conclusions: The novel tapered-tip sheath system is a promising option for precisely and safely delivering biopsy forceps to target sites, thereby facilitating the diagnosis of biliary strictures.

Indexed as

Bile DuctsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultBile duct neoplasmsBile ductsBiopsyCholestasisIntention to treat analysis

Identifiers

PMID39778881
PMCPMC11736313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.