ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2025
Predicting Parkinson's Disease Using a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Analyze Prodromal Medical and Prescription Data.
Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence That Changes Clinical Neurology Practice: Translating Algorithms Into Actionable Care.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- The Body-First Trajectory: Mapping the Hidden Prologue of Lewy Body Diseases.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- An Exploration of the High Prevalence of Parkinson's Disease in a Rural Area of North West England.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review on Biochemical Markers and Emerging Treatments in Prodromal Synucleinopathies.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Digital Healthcare in Future Medicine: From Research to Clinical Practice in Neurology.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeParkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by various prodromal symptoms, and these symptoms are mostly investigated retrospectively. While some symptoms such as rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder are highly specific, others are common. This makes it challenging to predict those at risk of PD based solely on less-specific prodromal symptoms. The prediction accuracy when using only less-specific symptoms can be improved by analyzing the vast amount of information available using sophisticated deep-learning techniques. This study aimed to improve the performance of deep-learning-based screening in detecting prodromal PD using medical-claims data, including prescription information.
methodsWe sampled 820 PD patients and 8,200 age- and sex-matched non-PD controls from Korean National Health Insurance cohort data. A deep-learning algorithm was developed using various combinations of diagnostic codes, medication codes, and prodromal periods.
resultsDuring the prodromal period from year -3 to year 0, predicting PD using only diagnostic codes yielded a high accuracy of 0.937. Adding medication codes for the same period did not increase the accuracy (0.931-0.935). For the earlier prodromal period (year -6 to year -3), the accuracy of PD prediction decreased to 0.890 when using only diagnostic codes. The inclusion of all medication-codes data increased that accuracy markedly to 0.922.
conclusionsA deep-learning algorithm using both prodromal diagnostic and medication codes was effective in screening PD. Developing a surveillance system with automatically collected medical-claims data for those at risk of developing PD could be cost-effective. This approach could streamline the process of developing disease-modifying drugs by focusing on the most-appropriate candidates for inclusion in accurate diagnostic tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.