ArticleOncology2025
Analysis of Pleiotropic Effects of Nivolumab in Patients with Relapsed Pleural Mesothelioma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Strategies in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pleural Mesothelioma: An Overview.Thoracic cancer · 2026Review
- Prognostic Significance of Tumor-Cell VISTA Expression on Survival Outcomes in Nivolumab-Treated Pleural Mesothelioma: The HOT1901 Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy for pleural mesothelioma: from innovation to the frontlines of core clinical questions.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn August 2018, the Japanese PMDA approved nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, for previously treated, unresectable, advanced, or recurrent pleural mesothelioma (PM) based on the MERIT trial, a phase II study of 34 cases. However, concerns regarding limited evidence persist.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 83 patients with previously treated, unresectable, advanced, or recurrent malignant PM treated with nivolumab from August 2018 to May 2022. Efficacy was evaluated using overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) per modified RECIST criteria. Safety was assessed by treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) according to CTCAE v5.0. PD-L1 expression was analyzed with the anti-PD-1 antibody (22C3).
resultsThe median age was 73 years. Histological subtypes included epithelioid (60), sarcomatoid (15), biphasic (6), and unknown (2). Lines of treatment were 2nd (62), 3rd (13), and 4th or later (8). Partial response was seen in 16 patients, stable disease in 30, progressive disease in 29, and not evaluable in 8, with an ORR of 19.3% and a disease control rate of 55.4%. Median PFS and OS were 5.1 and 12.4 months, respectively. TRAEs occurred in 45 patients (54.2%), with grade ≥3 in 6 (7.2%) and one treatment-related death. PFS correlated with male gender, TRAEs, and good performance status (PS: 0-1), while OS correlated with PS.
conclusionNivolumab demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical practice, supporting its use in patients with good PS, even in later lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.