Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39778413›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2025

Toward a comprehensive profiling of alternative splicing proteoform structures, interactions and functions.

Elodie Laine, Maria Inés Freiberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elodie LaineSorbonne Université, CNRS, IBPS, Laboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology (LCQB), UMR 7238, 75005 Paris, France; Institut universitaire de France (IUF), France. Electronic address: elodie.laine@sorbonne-universite.fr.
Maria Inés FreibergerSorbonne Université, CNRS, IBPS, Laboratory of Computational and Quantitative Biology (LCQB), UMR 7238, 75005 Paris, France.

Funding

European Research Council 101087830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mRNA splicing machinery has been estimated to generate 100,000 known protein-coding transcripts for 20,000 human genes (Ensembl, Sept. 2024). However, this set is expanding with the massive and rapidly growing data coming from high-throughput technologies, particularly single-cell and long-read sequencing. Yet, the implications of splicing complexity at the protein level remain largely uncharted. In this review, we describe the current advances toward systematically assessing the contribution of alternative splicing to proteome function diversification. We discuss the potential and challenges of using artificial intelligence-based techniques in identifying alternative splicing proteoforms and characterising their structures, interactions, and functions.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingProteomeProteomicsAnimalsHumansProteome

Identifiers

PMID39778413
PMCPMC7617313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.