ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2025
Research Progress on the Posterior Midline Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.
Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy analysis of percutaneous cannulated paravertebral approach for microscopic resection of intraspinal schwannomas: A case series.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Modified Spinous Process-Splitting Approach for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With Neurological Deficits: Technical Description and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Analysis of the efficacy and postoperative complications of thoracoscopic resection through the transthoracic posterior approach of thoracic paravertebral dumbbell-shaped schwannoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The traditional posterior median approach laminectomy is widely used for lumbar decompression. However, the bilateral dissection of paraspinal muscles during this procedure often leads to postoperative muscle atrophy, chronic low back pain, and other complications. The posterior midline spinous process-splitting approach (SPSA) offers a significant advantage over the traditional approach by minimizing damage to the paraspinal muscles. SPSA reduces the incidence of muscle atrophy and chronic low back pain while maintaining the integrity of the posterior spinal structures. The technique involves longitudinal splitting of the spinous process, which allows for adequate access to the lamina for decompression without detaching the paraspinal muscles. As a result, it provides a clearer surgical field and facilitates muscle preservation, which reduces the risk of postoperative complications. Additionally, SPSA requires only standard surgical instruments, making it accessible in most surgical settings. This paper reviews the anatomical considerations, surgical techniques, and clinical applications of the SPSA, highlighting its effectiveness in reducing muscle atrophy and improving recovery outcomes. The paper also discusses its potential in treating conditions such as lumbar spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for future research to establish the long-term benefits of SPSA and refine surgical techniques. The results suggest that SPSA is a promising alternative to traditional approaches, with better outcomes in terms of muscle preservation and overall recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.