Observational studyCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2025
Contemporary Use of Post-Dilatation for Stent Optimization During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Results From the Netherlands Heart Registration.
Observational study in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Stent Implantation With Liberal Use of High-pressure Non-compliant Balloon Post-dilatation Versus Contemporary Practice
Optimization of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Liberal Use of Intracoronary Imaging Versus Contemporary Practice
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stent Undersizing and Malapposition: Mechanical Causes of Acute and Late Stent Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of moderate-to-severe coronary calcification on 1-year clinical outcomes after IVUS-guided PCI.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- The importance of post-dilatation during PCI: current evidence and future directions.Future cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsPost-dilatation after stenting with a non-compliant (NC) balloon can be used to improve overall percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) result. Due to lack of evidence on the effect of post-dilatation on adverse clinical endpoints there is no consensus whether post-dilatation should be used routinely. The aim of the current study was to determine the contemporary practice of post-dilatation.
methodsThis study included patients from the Netherlands Heart Registration who underwent PCI between the 4th quarter of 2020 and the 3rd quarter of 2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of post-dilatation with a NC balloon. Secondary endpoints included differences in baseline and procedural characteristics of patients that received post-dilatation and patients that did not receive post-dilatation.
resultsOut of 12,960 patients from 11 hospitals, 49.9% underwent post-dilatation. There was a variety in post-dilatation between hospitals ranging from 29.3% to 82.7% and among operators ranging from 15.9% to 90.5%. Post-dilatation was used less frequent in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or out of hospital cardiac arrest. Multivessel and left main PCI, long stent length and use of intracoronary imaging and calcium modification were associated with increased use of post-dilatation. When imaging was used, the percentage of post-dilatation was 79.4%.
conclusionsIn the Netherlands, stent optimization with post-dilatation using NC balloon is performed in only half of the patients undergoing PCI, with variations in frequency across centres and operators. Post-dilatation is more often used in cases of complex PCI and when intracoronary imaging or calcium modification techniques are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.