Trial reportPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2025
Multicomponent telerehabilitation program for veterans with multimorbidity: A randomized controlled feasibility study.
Trial report in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder veterans with multimorbidity experience physical and social vulnerabilities that complicate receipt of and adherence to physical rehabilitation services. Thus, traditional physical rehabilitation programs are insufficient to address this population's heterogenous clinical presentation.
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a MultiComponent TeleRehabilitation (MCTR) program for older veterans with multimorbidity.
designRandomized controlled cross-over feasibility study.
settingTelehealth from Veterans Affairs Medical Center to participants' homes.
participantsFifty U.S. military veterans, age ≥60 years (mean ± SD; 69.2 ± 6.7) with ≥3 comorbidities (6.0 ± 1.9), and impaired physical function were randomized and allocated equally to two groups.
interventionThe MCTR program consisted of high-intensity rehabilitation, coaching, social support, and technologies. Physical therapists delivered 12 individual and 20 group telerehabilitation sessions/participant. Participants in the education group started the MCTR program after 12 weeks.
main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was combined adherence (>75% of participants attending ≥80% sessions). Acceptability was measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Secondary outcomes included safety, participant surveys, and physical function. Patient-level outcomes were collected at baseline, 12 (primary time point), and 24 weeks.
resultsOf 50 participants, 39 adhered to total session attendance (0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.88], p = .76), 45 adhered to individual sessions (0.90 [95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.97], p = .01), and 48 rated the program as acceptable (0.96 [95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.99], p < .001). Thirty-five participants reported 78 safety events, and 12 (15%) had some degree of relatedness to the protocol. Most patient-level outcomes were similar between groups at 12-weeks.
conclusionsThe MCTR program was feasible based on high adherence to individual sessions and high acceptability. Adherence results were consistent with previous exercise studies in older adults. Most in-session safety events were related to underlying medical conditions and consistent with in-person physical rehabilitation safety events. These results can inform use of telerehabilitation for similar populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.