Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777814›Full record

ArticleMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2025

Combining In Vivo Two-Photon and Laser Speckle Microscopy With the Ex Vivo Capillary-Parenchymal Arteriole Preparation as a Novel Approach to Study Neurovascular Coupling.

Lowri E Evans, Anna L Gray, Katy R Walsh, Thea G E Danby, Harry A T Pritchard, Stuart M Allan, Alison M Gurney, Adam S Greenstein, Ingo Schiessl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Persistent dysmorphology and dysfunction of the brain microvasculature following repeated trauma.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Article
  3. Understanding Vascular Reactivity.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lowri E EvansGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2884-921X
Anna L GrayGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-8355
Katy R WalshGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8349-2933
Thea G E DanbyGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-1986-2655
Harry A T PritchardGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-0909
Stuart M AllanGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9646-4456
Alison M GurneyGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Adam S GreensteinGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4189
Ingo SchiesslGeoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9599-6194

Funding

British Heart Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCerebral blood flow (CBF) decline is increasingly recognized as an area of importance for targeting neurodegenerative disorders, yet full understanding of the mechanisms that underlie CBF changes are lacking. Animal models are crucial for expanding our knowledge as methods for studying global CBF and neurovascular coupling in humans are limited and require expensive specialized scanners.

methodsUse of appropriate animal models can increase our understanding of cerebrovascular function, so we have combined chronic cranial windows with in vivo two-photon and laser speckle microscopy and ex vivo capillary-parenchymal arteriole (CaPA) preparations. Chronic cranial windows allow for longitudinal direct observation of the cerebral microvasculature and surrounding parenchyma while the CaPA preparation can assess capillary and arteriole function in isolation of the neuronal tissue.

resultsHere, we found that extra-dural cranial windows and related imaging protocols do not affect vascular function in the CaPA preparation. Cortical vessels from animals that have undergone imaging can therefore be taken to discover physiological alterations in the cerebral vasculature that contribute to any observed in vivo changes.

conclusionThis approach will enhance neurodegenerative research with the benefit of limiting animal usage.

Indexed as

CapillariesCerebrovascular CirculationNeurovascular CouplingAnimalsArteriolesLaser Speckle Contrast ImagingMaleMiceMicroscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphotoncerebrovascularin vivo imagingmyographyneurovascular

Identifiers

PMID39777814
PMCPMC11706670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.