Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777685›Full record

ArticleAnimal genetics2025

Unexpected recombination at the polled locus in a horned Holstein calf from the mating of a homozygous polled sire and a heterozygous polled cow.

Bertram Brenig

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Animal genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bertram BrenigInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7635-9656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, I report an unexpected case of a Holstein calf that developed horns even though the sire was homozygous and the dam was heterozygous for polledness. After verifying and confirming the correct parentage, the parents and offspring were genotyped with the Illumina EuroG_MD BeadChip and the SNPs in the polled region on chromosome 1 were evaluated. In addition, the father was sequenced with next generation sequencing to identify possible, previously unknown variants. The deletion of two base pairs within the causative 80-kb duplication described for the Friesian polled variant was verified by melting curve analysis and the 80-kb duplication by droplet digital PCR. Analysis of all data showed that, as expected, the calf was heterozygous for all SNP positions flanking the 80-kb duplication but was homozygous wild type in the 80-kb duplication region and therefore carried horns. This is certainly a very rare case of a recombination within the highly conserved polled region, which on the one hand confirms that only the 80-kb duplication is responsible for the expression of the Friesian polled variant, but on the other hand also shows that caution is required when interpreting the usual routine genotyping of the horn status based on linked single nucleotide polymorphisms in the polled region on chromosome 1. Based on the present case, it is recommended that, in addition to the evaluation of the SNP data of the BeadChip, an extended diagnosis with direct detection of the 2-bp deletion (1:g.2629156_2629158delGT) should be carried out in any case when detecting the Friesian polled variant.

Indexed as

Genetic LociHeterozygoteHomozygoteHornsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, GeneticSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsCattleFemaleGenotypeMaleBTA1Celtic variantFriesian variantHolsteinhornedpolledrecombination

Identifiers

PMID39777685
PMCPMC11707570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.