ArticleFamily medicine2025
Underrepresented in Medicine Mentorship Program: Perceived Benefits and Lessons Learned.
Article in Family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Essential Yet Invisible: Professional Identity Formation Among Academic Internal Medicine Hospitalists.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Minority Student Tax.Family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFaculty members who are underrepresented in medicine (URM) may benefit from mentorship that is designed specifically to meet their unique needs and is focused on improving their career pathways in academic medicine. The Underrepresented in Medicine Mentorship Program (URM-MP) is an academic society-based mentorship program that pairs early career URM faculty with mid- to late-career faculty specifically trained to address URM issues.
methodsDuring the first 3 years of the program, mentors received web-based training on addressing oppression and marginalization of URM faculty in academic medicine. Mentor and mentee pairs met monthly for 1 year and received support from program leaders through web-based check-in meetings twice per year. Pre- and postassessment data were collected from mentees to help identify their needs and evaluate their experiences. Check-in meetings provided feedback about the program.
resultsFifty-seven URM faculty participated in years 1, 2, and 3. Results of pre- and postsurveys showed that mentees significantly improved their self-perceived effectiveness to enhance their careers, to find resources to perform their jobs, and to navigate the challenges of advancing in academic medicine. Qualitative analyses revealed themes of appreciation for mentors supporting their unique experiences as URM faculty. Check-in feedback further reinforced the relationship aspects of the mentorship as a significant benefit of this program.
conclusionsSociety-based mentorship that involves specific training for mentors and fosters trusting mentor-mentee relationships can improve URM faculty's confidence regarding their ability to succeed in academic medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.