Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777648›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2025

Listen, act and support: An investigation into individual and organisational incivility management in veterinary practice.

Amy Irwin, Luiz Santos, Helen Silver-MacMahon, Liz Mossop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy IrwinApplied Psychology & Human Factors Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2526-4750
Luiz SantosSchool of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Helen Silver-MacMahonBeing Human Consulting, London, UK.
Liz MossopSheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigates the impact of workplace and client incivility on veterinary staff wellbeing and job satisfaction, examining both individual responses and organisational support mechanisms to identify best practices for managing incivility.

methodA mixed-methods approach was employed, involving a survey of 192 veterinary professionals from various roles and practice types. The survey measured experiences of incivility, individual factors (anxiety, stress, burnout, job satisfaction and turnover intention) and organisational factors (perceived organisational support, social support and civility climate).

resultsClient incivility was a significant predictor of increased anxiety, burnout and stress, while co-worker incivility was a significant predictor of increased anxiety. Organisational support and team civility were found to be significant predictors of job satisfaction and turnover intention, with organisational support mediating the impact of co-worker incivility on anxiety. Qualitative analysis highlighted the importance of listening to staff concerns and taking proactive measures to address incivility. LIMITATIONS: The data are cross-sectional and subjective, and the sample is predominantly female.

conclusionEffective management of incivility in veterinary practices requires robust organisational support and clear policies. Practices should prioritise listening to staff, fostering a supportive environment and implementing training programs to mitigate the adverse effects of incivility on staff wellbeing and job satisfaction.

Indexed as

IncivilityVeterinariansVeterinary MedicineAdultAnxietyBurnout, ProfessionalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational CulturePersonnel TurnoverSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39777648
PMCPMC11783998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.