ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025
Venetoclax therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients relapsed after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venetoclax therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients relapsed after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) remains an option for young and fit chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) patients with high-risk disease features. However, allotransplanted patients are generally excluded from clinical trials, making data regarding the use of venetoclax after alloHSCT extremely rare. We report data from 7 CLL patients who received venetoclax after alloHSCT among 53 Italian centers. These patients underwent alloHSCT between 2006 and 2021 after failing chemoimmunotherapy (7/7), ibrutinib (5/7) and/or idelalisib (1/7). Of note, 3/7 patients had already received venetoclax-based therapy before alloHSCT. Post-allo HSCT venetoclax treatment resulted safe, with adverse events not different from what reported in clinical trials. Importantly, no meaningful impact on graft versus host disease (GvHD) course was observed: 4/7 patients with pre-existing chronic GvHD had no exacerbation after venetoclax start, and only one patient developed GvHD during venetoclax therapy, that was managed as per standard clinical practice. Concerning efficacy, 5/7 patients presented a clinical response to venetoclax, with two patients achieving an undetectable minimal residual disease. To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of CLL patients treated with venetoclax after alloHSCT. In these heavily pretreated and high-risk patients, previous alloHSCT did not compromise the feasibility of venetoclax therapy, that lacked unexpected toxicities and did not exacerbate GvHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.