ArticleEmergency radiology2025
Radiology resident competency in orthopedic trauma detection in simulated on-call scenarios.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate radiology residents' ability to accurately identify three specific types of orthopedic trauma using radiographic imaging within a simulated on-call environment.
methodsWe utilized the Wisdom in Diagnostic Imaging Emergent/Critical Care Radiology Simulation (WIDI SIM) to assess residents' preparedness for independent radiology call. The simulation included 65 cases, with three focusing on orthopedic trauma: sacral ala, femoral neck, and pediatric tibial/Toddler's fractures. Faculty graded residents' responses using a standardized 10-point rubric and categorized errors as observational (failing to identify key findings) or interpretive (incorrect conclusions despite correct identification of findings).
results321 residents evaluated sacral ala fracture radiographs and received an average score of 1.29/10, with 8.71 points lost to observational errors. Only 6% produced effective reports (scores ≥ 7), while 80% made critical errors (scores < 2). For femoral neck fracture CT images (n = 316 residents), the average score was 2.48/10, with 6.71 points lost to observational errors. 25% produced effective reports, and 66% made critical errors. Pediatric tibial/Toddler's fracture radiographs (n = 197 residents) yielded an average score of 2.94/10, with 6.60 points lost to observational errors. 29% generated effective reports, while 71% made critical errors.
conclusionRadiology residents demonstrated significant difficulty in identifying these orthopedic trauma cases, with errors primarily attributed to observational deficiencies. These findings suggest a need for targeted educational interventions in radiology residency programs to improve the identification of these fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.