ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2025
The Role of [
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Cancers · 2026Article
- Regressed anterior mediastinal nodule secondary to removal of dental crowns.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
- The Value of Baseline [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Models Derived from [Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([ PATIENTS AND
methodsIn total, 116 patients (49/67 M/F; mean age 59.5 years) who underwent preoperative [
resultsIn total, 27 thymic hyperplasia, 41 low-risk thymomas (LRT) (types A, AB, and B1), and 48 high-risk thymomas (HRT) (B2, B3 thymoma, and carcinoma) were included. SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, rPET, qPET, and T/M were significantly higher in HRT than LRT and hyperplasia (p < 0.001). TLG and MTV were significantly higher in patients with LRT (p < 0.001). Only rPET, qPET, and T/M remained significantly higher in HRT than in LRT subgroups (p = 0.042, p = 0.049, and p = 0.028, respectively). SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak cutoffs of < 4.3, < 2.87, and 4.03, respectively, significantly distinguished patients with longer FFR (p = 0.009, p = 0.05, and p = 0.05).
conclusionsPositron emission tomography (PET) metabolic parameters could help to differentiate thymic histotypes. Standardized uptake value (SUV)-based parameters appear promising to predict recurrent disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.