Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777603›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

A Self-supervised Deep Learning Model for Diagonal Sulcus Detection with Limited Labeled Data.

Delfina Braggio, Hernán C Külsgaard, Mariana Vallejo-Azar, Mariana Bendersky, Paula González, Lucía Alba-Ferrara, José Ignacio Orlando, Ignacio Larrabide

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Delfina Braggio *Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina. delfinabraggio@pladema.exa.unicen.edu.ar.
Hernán C Külsgaard *Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana Vallejo-AzarConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana BenderskyLaboratorio de Anatomía Viviente, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula GonzálezConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lucía Alba-FerraraUnidad Ejecutora de Estudios en Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos, CONICET, UNAJ, Hospital El Cruce, Florencio Varela, Argentina.
José Ignacio OrlandoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ignacio LarrabideConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sulci are a fundamental part of brain morphology, closely linked to brain function, cognition, and behavior. Tertiary sulci, characterized as the shallowest and smallest subtype, pose a challenging task for detection. The diagonal sulcus (ds), located in a crucial area in language processing, has a prevalence between 50% and 60%. Automatic detection of the ds is an unexplored field: while some sulci segmenters include the ds, their accuracy is usually low. In this work, we present a deep learning based model for ds detection using a fine-tuning approach with limited training labeled data. A convolutional autoencoder was employed to learn specific features related to brain morphology with unlabeled data through self-supervised learning. Subsequently, the pre-trained network was fine-tuned to detect the ds using a less extensive labeled dataset. We achieved a mean F1-score of 0.7176 (SD=0.0736) for the test set and a F1-score of 0.72 for a second held-out set, surpassing the results of a standard software and other alternative deep learning models. We conducted an interpretability analysis of the results using occlusion maps and observed that the models focused on adjacent sulci to the ds for prediction, consistent with the approach taken by experts in manual annotation. We also analyzed the challenges of manual labeling by conducting a thorough examination of interrater agreement on a small dataset and its relationship with our model's performance. Finally, we applied our method on a population analysis and reported the prevalence of ds in a case study.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural Networks, ComputerSupervised Machine LearningAutomatic classificationDiagonal sulcusFine-tuningMachine learningTertiary sulci

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.