ArticleNeuroinformatics2025
A Self-supervised Deep Learning Model for Diagonal Sulcus Detection with Limited Labeled Data.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulci are a fundamental part of brain morphology, closely linked to brain function, cognition, and behavior. Tertiary sulci, characterized as the shallowest and smallest subtype, pose a challenging task for detection. The diagonal sulcus (ds), located in a crucial area in language processing, has a prevalence between 50% and 60%. Automatic detection of the ds is an unexplored field: while some sulci segmenters include the ds, their accuracy is usually low. In this work, we present a deep learning based model for ds detection using a fine-tuning approach with limited training labeled data. A convolutional autoencoder was employed to learn specific features related to brain morphology with unlabeled data through self-supervised learning. Subsequently, the pre-trained network was fine-tuned to detect the ds using a less extensive labeled dataset. We achieved a mean F1-score of 0.7176 (SD=0.0736) for the test set and a F1-score of 0.72 for a second held-out set, surpassing the results of a standard software and other alternative deep learning models. We conducted an interpretability analysis of the results using occlusion maps and observed that the models focused on adjacent sulci to the ds for prediction, consistent with the approach taken by experts in manual annotation. We also analyzed the challenges of manual labeling by conducting a thorough examination of interrater agreement on a small dataset and its relationship with our model's performance. Finally, we applied our method on a population analysis and reported the prevalence of ds in a case study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.