ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Minimal residue disease detection in early-stage breast cancer: a review.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating tumour cells for guiding antibody‒drug conjugate therapy: Role of artificial intelligence.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Evolution of the Use of Circulating DNA as a Biomarker in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Dual ctDNA and CTCs analysis for minimal residual disease detection and relapse monitoring in early-stage breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past five years, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has emerged as a game-changer in cancer research, serving as a less invasive and highly sensitive method to monitor tumor dynamics. CtDNA testing has a wide range of potential applications in breast cancer (BC) management, including diagnosis, monitoring treatment responses, identifying resistance mutations, predicting prognosis, and detecting future relapses. In this review, we focus on the prognostic and predictive value of ctDNA testing for BC in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. We also examine the rationale behind mainstream minimal residue disease (MRD) tracking methods and highlight key considerations for successful MRD testing. Clinical evidence has shown that ctDNA-based MRD testing can accurately detect molecular relapse 8-12 months before clinical relapse in early-stage BC. Compared to advanced-stage BC, detecting ctDNA in early-stage BC is more challenging and requires ultra-sensitive testing methods due to the low levels of ctDNA released into the bloodstream, particularly in post-surgical settings, after effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in late adjuvant settings that require longer follow-up. Therefore, future efforts are needed to generate additional clinical evidence in these settings to support the clinical utility and widespread adoption of ctDNA-based MRD testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777588What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.