ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Predictive Factors for Poor Outcome after Laparoscopic and Open Colposuspension: A Comparative Analysis Using the BSUG Database.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionColposuspension has been a well-accepted surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) since 1961. However, there is limited research on predictors of poor outcomes in both laparoscopic colposuspension (LC) and open colposuspension (OC) procedures. This study aimed to identify predictors linked to patient-reported failure after colposuspension. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent their first colposuspension surgery. The data were collected prospectively on the British Society of Urogynaecology database. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII) for incontinence; PGII score 3-7 was defined as failure.
resultsA total of 3104 women (1181 in LC and 1923 in OC) were analysed. On multivariate analyses, having a cystocele stage ≥ 2 was significantly predictive of failure (OR 2.573, 95% CI 1.086-6.098; p = 0.032) in LC. In OC, previous midurethral sling (MUS) procedure (OR 1.807, 95% CI 1.169-2.795; p = 0.008) and previous prolapse surgery (OR 1.954, 95% CI 1.235-3.093; p = 0.004) independently, were significant predictors of failure. OC had higher success (better PGII) than LC (p < 0.001), whilst adverse events such as blood loss, rates of urinary retention and duration of admission (p < 0.001) were lower in LC.
conclusionVariables found to be independently significant for failed colposuspension were different in the two approaches. Previous pelvic organ prolapse surgery and/or midurethral sling appeared to be the most significant predictors for failed OC, whilst in the LC group, having a stage ≥ 2 cystocele was predictive of failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.