ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025
Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer-results of a clinical series.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NARCT) is an established standard of care in various tumor entities, promoting high response rates at commonly lower toxicities as compared to adjuvant approaches. This retrospective analysis was designed to investigate NARCT in early-stage high-risk cervical cancer.
methodsForty patients with early-stage high-risk cervical cancer (i.e., L1, V1, G3, N+, >
resultsBoth NARCT and subsequent tumor resection were feasible and conducted in 39 of 40 patients (95%). Early toxicity was moderate, with no grade 3 or higher toxicities following NARCT and surgery. NARCT yielded significant downstaging in all patients, and pathological complete remission (pCR) was achieved in 14 patients (36%). After 5 years, overall survival (OS), freedom from local progression (FFLP), and freedom from distant progression (FFDP) rates were 84.2%, 75.9%, and 73.1%, respectively. Late proctitis (grade 1 in 8%) and urinary cystitis (grade 1-3 in 35%) occurred at acceptable rates.
conclusionIn resectable early-stage high-risk cervical cancer, NARCT is feasible and safe. Clinical, imaging, and pathological response rates are high. Impressive long-term survival and tumor control rates at modest toxicities encourage the initiation of a prospective and randomized trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777512What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.