Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777482›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025

[Diagnostic tools for stroke detection-from prehospital to diagnosis].

Christian Claudi, André Worm, Patrick Schramm, Hagen B Huttner

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian ClaudiNeurologische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. christian.claudi@neuro.med.uni-giessen.de.
André WormNeurologische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
Patrick SchrammNeurologische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
Hagen B HuttnerNeurologische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Gießen, Klinikstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrokes are common neurological emergencies that require rapid diagnosis to minimize long-term damage. Prehospital detection and triage play a critical role in patient outcomes.

objectiveHow effective are different prehospital diagnostic tools for stroke detection, and which triage strategies optimize patient care?

methodsThe article compares prehospital diagnostic tools for stroke detection and evaluates different transport strategies. Case studies illustrate their practical application.

resultsTraditional stroke diagnosis methods have limitations, particularly in identifying strokes in the posterior circulation. Newer diagnostic tools that incorporate additional symptoms, such as dizziness and vision problems, show higher sensitivity. The choice of triage strategy depends on the severity of symptoms and regional factors. Direct transport to specialized centers is beneficial for severe strokes, while initial stabilization at nearby units is more efficient in rural areas.

conclusionModern diagnostic tools offer better sensitivity for prehospital stroke detection. Regional cooperation and the selection of appropriate triage strategies are key to improving stroke care.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesStrokeHumansSensitivity and SpecificityTriageDiagnostic imaging/strokeDrip-and-ship modelMothership modelPrehospital diagnostic toolsPrehospital emergency care/stroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.