ArticleJAMA network open2025
KRAS Mutation Status and Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Phase II Trial of an Extended-Release siRNA Implant Targeting KRASG12D/V in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Adult Thalamic Diffuse Midline Glioma, H3 K27-Altered, WithJournal of medical cases · 2026Article
- Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Versus Standard Resection in T3 Body and Tail Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- ARNTL2 promotes metastatic phenotypes through SERPINE1 transcription in KRAS G12D pancreatic cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Impact of Tumor Genomic Profile on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results From the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Oral KRAS G12D inhibitor GFH375 for previously treated advanced solid tumors with KRASNature medicine · 2026Article
- Precision immunotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer: OPTIMIZE-1 biomarker-driven patient stratification for future studies.Annals of pancreatic cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Unexpected Long-Term Survival in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Harboring KRAS G12R with an Ultra-Low-VAF SMAD4 Mutation: A Case Report and Mini-Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Chitosan-PEG Nanoparticles for Co-Delivery of Paclitaxel and KRAS G12D-Directed siRNA to Pancreatic Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The KRAS targeting revolution in metastatic pancreatic cancer: insights from the landmark RASolute-302 trial and emerging allele-specific strategies at ASCO 2026.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- The evolution of cancer therapeutics: from "undruggable" to "drugged".Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Nintedanib inhibits the VEGFR-ERK signaling pathway in human KRAS-mutated cancer cells.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Optimization of first-line treatment selection in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma using artificial intelligence.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- KRAS G12R in pancreatic cancer: why this mutation resists current inhibitor strategies.The oncologist · 2026Review
- Genomic Biomarkers for First-Line Treatment Selection in Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Fra-2 controls the response to the KRAS inhibitor MRTX-1133 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Deciphering RTK-RAS and MAPK Pathway Dependencies in Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Through Conversational Artificial Intelligence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agents-Enabled Dissection of RTK-RAS and MAPK Pathway Dependencies in Gemcitabine-Treated Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Despite the high prevalence of KRAS alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the clinical impact of common KRAS mutations with different cytotoxic regimens is unknown. This evidence is important to inform current treatment and provide a benchmark for emergent targeted KRAS therapies in metastatic PDAC. Objective: To assess the clinical implications of common KRAS G12 mutations in PDAC and to compare outcomes of standard-of-care multiagent therapies across these common mutations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study obtained deidentified clinical data for 5382 patients from a nationwide (US-based) clinicogenomic database. The deidentified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). Patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC from February 9, 2010, to September 20, 2022, and with sufficient follow-up and treatment data were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Median overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were calculated for each KRAS mutation group. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for KRAS mutations and mutation-treatment combinations. Results: A total of 2433 patients with PDAC were included in the analysis (mean age at first treatment, 67.0 [range, 66.0-68.0] years; 1340 male [55.1%]). Among 2023 patients with KRAS mutations, those with G12R had the longest median TTNT (6.0 [95% CI, 5.2-6.6] months) and the longest median OS (13.2 [95% CI, 10.6-15.2] months). Patients with KRAS G12D and G12V mutations had a significantly higher risk of disease progression (HRs, 1.15; [95% CI, 1.04-1.29; P = .009] and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P = .01], respectively) and death (HRs, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.15-1.45; P < .001] and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001], respectively) compared with KRAS wild type. The FOLFIRINOX regimen (fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin) had a significantly lower risk of treatment progression and death than gemcitabine with (HRs, 1.19 [95% CI, [1.09-1.29; P < .001] and 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07-1.29; P < .001], respectively) or without (HRs, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.11-1.69; P = .003] and 1.41 [95% CI 1.13-1.75; P = .002], respectively) nab-paclitaxel across all patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 2433 patients with PDAC, KRAS G12D and G12V mutations were associated with worse patient outcomes compared with KRAS wild type. KRAS G12R was associated with more favorable patient outcomes, and FOLFIRINOX was associated with better patient outcomes than gemcitabine-based therapies. These findings highlight the need for more effective systemic therapies for these groups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.