Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777338›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Clinical breast examination and its associated factors among reproductive age women in Ghana: multilevel logistic regression analysis.

Zenebe Abebe Gebreegziabher, Birhan Ewunu Semagn, Agmasie Damtew Walle, Mahider Awoke Belay, Wubet Tazeb Wondie, Gezahagn Demsu Degefaw, Werkneh Melkie Tilahun, Ermiyas Endewunet Melaku, Tadesse Mamo Dejene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zenebe Abebe GebreegziabherDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Birhan Ewunu SemagnDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Agmasie Damtew WalleDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Mahider Awoke BelayDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia.
Wubet Tazeb WondieDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, College of Medicine, and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Gezahagn Demsu DegefawDepartment of Neonatal Health Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, and Specialized Hospital, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Werkneh Melkie TilahunDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Ermiyas Endewunet MelakuDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Tadesse Mamo DejeneDepartment of Public Health, School of Public Health, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer poses a significant health burden in Ghana and globally, being the primary cause of cancer-related illness and death among women. The World Health Organization has identified clinical breast examination as the gold standard for women in low and middle-income countries. However, the uptake of clinical breast examination remains low in these settings, including Ghana, where the nationwide prevalence and associated factors of this practice have not been determined. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence and factors associated with clinical breast examination among women of reproductive age in Ghana, using data from 2022 Ghanaian Demographic and Health Survey. Methods: In this study, data from the most recent Ghanaian Demographic Health Survey conducted in 2022 were utilized. The survey used a two-stage stratified sampling technique, and a weighted sample of 15,013 participants was included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies, percentages, and graphical representations, were utilized to present the study's findings. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with clinical breast examination. Results: The study found that the prevalence of clinical breast examination was 18.39% (95% CI: 17.8-19.0%). Age group of 45 to 49 (AOR=2.84, 95% CI: 2.13, 3.78), having completed secondary education (AOR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.41, 2.06), having diploma or above education (AOR=3.63, 95% CI: 2.86, 4.61), using modern contraception (AOR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.25), having health insurance coverage (AOR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.89), listening to the radio at least once per week (AOR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.53), reading a newspaper at least once per week (AOR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.39, 2.21), being tested for HIV (AOR=1.92, 95% CI: 1.68, 2.19), undergoing screening for cervical cancer (AOR=6.64, 95% CI: 5.51, 7.99), being currently employed (AOR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.34), visiting a health facility within the past 12 months (AOR=1.36, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.51), belonging to the wealthiest wealth categories (AOR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.27, 2.28), being from the North East region (AOR=1.96, 95% CI: 1.19, 3.22) or Oti region (AOR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.92), having a greater distance to a health facility (AOR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.98), and being from a community with a higher proportion of educated individuals (AOR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.61) were significant associated factors of clinical breast examination. Conclusions and recommendations: The study revealed that the magnitude of clinical breast examination among Ghanaian women was low. Age, educational status, modern contraceptives utilization, health insurance coverage, media exposure, HIV testing, cervical cancer screening, occupation, health facility visits, wealth index, and region were significantly associated with clinical breast examination. These findings suggest that public health interventions should prioritize addressing these factors to increase clinical breast examination uptake and promote early detection of breast cancer to improve the survival of women with breast cancer.

Indexed as

clinical breast examinationGDHSGhanamultilevelreproductive age women

Identifiers

PMID39777338
PMCPMC11703916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.