ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Development and validation of a novel model to predict post-stroke cognitive impairment within 6 months after acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ischemic stroke-specific cognitive dysfunction: a bibliometric analysis of research evolution.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Determinants of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- NIH Stroke Scale and age predict early post-stroke cognitive impairment.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Role and Relationship Between Homocysteine and HMolecular neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive decline following acute ischemic stroke (AIS), termed post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), is a prevalent phenomenon that significantly elevates disability and mortality rates among affected patients. The objective of this investigation was to develop a robust clinical prediction model capable of forecasting PSCI within six months post-AIS and subsequently validate its effectiveness. Methods: A cohort of 573 AIS patients was stratified into two groups: those with PSCI (260 cases) and those who remained cognitively normal (CN) (313 cases). These patients were further subdivided into three distinct cohorts: a development cohort comprising 193 AIS patients, an internal validation cohort with 193 AIS patients, and an external validation cohort encompassing 187 AIS patients. A thorough multifactor logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of PSCI, which were subsequently incorporated into the prediction model for comprehensive analysis and validation. The discriminatory power, calibration accuracy, and clinical net benefits of the prediction model were rigorously evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), calibration plots, and decision curve analyses, respectively. Results: Utilizing a meticulously selected panel of variables, including smoking status, alcohol consumption, female gender, low educational attainment, NIHSS score at admission, stroke progression, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, stroke localization, HCY levels, and Lp-PLA2 levels, a clinical prediction model was formulated to predict the occurrence of PSCI within six months of AIS. The model demonstrated AUC-ROC values of 0.898 (95%CI, 0.853-0.942), 0.847 (95%CI, 0.794-0.901), and 0.849 (95%CI, 0.7946-0.9031) in the development, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Further validation through calibration curve analyses, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests, and additional metrics confirmed the model's impressive predictive performance. Conclusion: The proposed model exhibits strong discriminative ability for predicting PSCI and holds considerable promise for guiding clinical decision-making. However, ongoing optimization with multicenter data is necessary to bolster its robustness and broaden its applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.