ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Self-Assessment Techniques in Clinical Studies in Public Universities in Anambra State: Benefits and Alignment With Supervisors Evaluation as Perceived by Medical Students.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research preparedness and competence among Nigerian medical and dental students applying for a research fellowship.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis research explores the perceptions of medical students regarding self-assessment techniques in clinical studies at public universities in Anambra State, Nigeria. Specifically, it investigates the benefits of these techniques and their perceived alignment with formal evaluations conducted by supervisors.
methodsUtilizing a descriptive cross-sectional study design, data were collected from 273 consenting medical students through an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed to capture students' demographics, experiences with self-assessment, and perceptions of its benefits in relation to supervisor evaluations.
resultsResults indicate a balanced representation of gender among respondents, with the majority falling within the 21‒25 years' age range, and nearly equal participation from students at the 500 and 600 levels across two institution types, Federal and State. The findings reveal a positive alignment between students' perception of self-assessments and formal evaluations, with no significant discrepancies observed between institutions or levels of study. Additionally, participants widely perceive self-assessment as beneficial for enhancing confidence, identifying learning gaps, fostering professional growth, and improving communication skills. Furthermore, students from both institutions and across different levels of study report similar perceived benefits from engaging in self-assessment practices.
conclusionsThere is a strong alignment between medical students' perceptions of self-assessments and formal evaluations, with no significant differences found across institutions or stages of study. Overall, self-assessment was viewed as valuable for boosting confidence, identifying areas for improvement, supporting professional development, and enhancing communication skills. Further exploration of students' perspectives will offer valuable insights for educators to design effective learning strategies and promote lifelong learning habits among medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.