ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Neurosurgical strategy based on the type of occult spinal dysraphism in omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defects complex: A review of 10 cases.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fetal imaging approach to spinal dysraphism diagnosis.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Omphalocele-exstrophy-imperforate anus-spinal defects (OEIS) complex is a rare, life-threatening congenital malformation primarily treated with abdominogenital repair. The optimal indication and timing of neurosurgical interventions for the associated spinal cord lesions remains insufficiently studied. We reviewed spinal dysraphism in OEIS to evaluate the best timing for neurosurgical intervention. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 10 patients with OEIS, analyzing their clinical and imaging data, as well as surgical and pathological findings. Results: Terminal myelocystocele (TMCC) and spinal lipomas were observed in 5 patients each. Of the spinal lipomas, one had a single filar lipoma, while four had double lipomas (3 caudal and dorsal; 1 filar and dorsal). TMCC manifested with severe lower limb motor dysfunction in addition to abdominogenital disorder at birth, with the cyst-induced lumbosacral mass increasing over time. Spinal lipomas were less symptomatic except for abdominogenital issues and demonstrated minimal growth of the intraspinal lipoma over time. Untethering surgery was performed in 8 patients (5 TMCC; 3 spinal lipomas) at a median age of 3 (range, 2-10) months for TMCC and 6 (range, 2-14) months for spinal lipomas. One TMCC patient (surgery at 10 months) experienced postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, necessitating three reoperations. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging is essential to diagnose spinal cord malformations accurately. The necessity and timing of surgical intervention differ between TMCC and spinal lipomas. Since TMCC lesions tend to enlarge, surgery should be performed as soon as the patient's abdominogenital condition stabilizes. For spinal lipomas, surgery should be considered carefully based on the patient's neurological condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.