ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Craniosynostosis incidence with abnormalities of orbital axis on patients under 8 years old.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Craniosynostosis may result in malformations of the orbit, which can be observed in clinical presentations. Craniosynostosis impairs the normal growth of the skull, which typically occurs perpendicular to the fused suture. Craniosynostosis is classified into non-syndromic and syndromic, with an incidence of 1: 2000-2500 live births. It is commonly affects the sagittal suture (40-60%), followed by the coronal suture (20-30%), the metopic suture (<10%), and rarely the lambdoid suture. Computed tomography (CT) scan plays a crucial role in identifying the type of cranial abnormality and associated disruptions in the orbital axis (OX). Methods: The research sample was craniosynostosis patients who were examined at the Radiology Department of Dr. Soetomo General Hospital at Surabaya, Indonesia for the period January 2017-March 2022, male or female aged <8 years and have never had head surgery. Evaluation of the position and axis of the extraocular muscles within the orbits is drawn on the coronal section. In this study, pediatric CT images were acquired at 100 kVp (CTDIvol 2.3 mGy; DLP 84.8 mGy*cm; scan time 6.1 s; helical pitch 0.297). The research was conducted using a case-control method. The case group consisted of patients with craniosynostosis, while the control group included patients without craniosynostosis, encompassing those with conditions such as meningoencephalitis. After the data source is obtained, then the case and control data are matched and then the Chi-square correlation test is carried out through Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: A significant correlation was found between the incidence of craniosynostosis and abnormalities of OX ( Conclusion: There is a significant correlation between the incidence of craniosynostosis that has two or more sutural fusions and abnormalities of OX. Strabismus associated with craniosynostosis is typically detected in patients at an older age. Hopefully, by analyzing the eye angle through CT scans while craniosynostosis is established, abnormalities of the orbital axis can be identified. So the progression of strabismus can be prevented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.