ArticleSurgical neurology international2024
Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea as a primary presentation of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, management strategies, and clinical outcome.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spontaneous, nontraumatic clival cerebrospinal fluid fistula, treated with microscope and titanium mesh. Case report and review of the literature.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- A rare case of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea via Sternberg canal: a case report with endoscopic endonasal repair.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Causes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea could be divided into primary (spontaneous) and secondary (head trauma and iatrogenic). Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) has emerged as a cause for spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea but is still underestimated, may be overlooked and needs special consideration in management. The objective of this study is to demonstrate spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea as the primary presentation of IIH and explore the algorithm of management. Methods: All patients with spontaneous (primary) CSF rhinorrhea were included with complete clinical and radiological assessment. We performed lumbar puncture and CSF pressure measurements in the lateral decubitus position for all included patients to detect those with intracranial hypertension. A pressure of 20 cmH2O in cases of CSF rhinorrhea is considered a cutoff for diagnosing raised intracranial pressure. When intracranial hypertension was diagnosed, patients were subjected immediately to lumboperitoneal shunt. If CSF leakage stopped after shunt insertion, we would not perform skull base repair, and the patient was sent for follow-up. However, if CSF leakage did not stop after shunt insertion despite normalization of intracranial tension or recurrence of CSF rhinorrhea despite shunt patency or there was intracranial pneumocephalus, skull base repair would be performed. Results: During the period of the study, 293 cases of CSF rhinorrhea were seen. Only 42 (14.3%) patients were diagnosed with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea, and the remaining were posttraumatic. Thirty-seven patients (88.1%) of 42 patients revealed high CSF pressure readings. All 37 patients received lumboperitoneal shunt followed by CSF rhinorrhea stoppage. Later, during follow-up, 7 patients developed recurrence of leakage; 3 of them revealed shunt obstruction, and rhinorrhea improved after shunt revision. The other 4 patients revealed patent shunt and needed skull base repair. Conclusion: Spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea is considered secondary to IIH until proven otherwise. Initial placement of lumboperitoneal shunt may provide an effective alternative to skull base repair for the treatment of patients with IIH presenting with CSF rhinorrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.