ArticleJournal of military and veterans' health2024
Caring for Post-9/11 Veterans in the Civilian Sector: Knowledge and Readiness of Registered and Advance Practice Nurse Providers.
Article in Journal of military and veterans' health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Since 2001, 3.5 million United States service members deployed overseas in support of the post-9711 Global War on Terror. While healthy and fit upon deployment, veterans have experienced many complex and often unexplainable illnesses and chronic diseases, with more than 520 000 being diagnosed with cancer. With the implementation of the VA MISSION and PACT Acts, post-911 veterans are increasingly being seen in non-VHA healthcare facilities by non-physician providers. Objective: To assess the readiness of registered and advanced practice nurses to provide knowledgeable and competent healthcare for post-9/11 veterans in the civilian healthcare system. Design setting and participants: A web-based survey was administered by the HunterSeven Foundation (a Veteran-founded non-profit organisation), with 541 nurse respondents. Primary outcomes and measures: Questions were designed to assess military knowledge, comfort level caring for veterans, self-reported proficiency and prior training of participants. Mean differences were compared using a restricted maximum likelihood, fixed-effects model, with incidence between groups estimated as log-binomial relative risks. Results: Meaningful gaps in clinical knowledge of screening for and treatment of medically related conditions were identified. Our assessment also highlighted a sparseness of knowledge for making care recommendations based on apposite resources. Conclusions and relevance: Cognitive biases among healthcare providers in the civilian sector may lead to missed and/or delayed diagnoses, therefore emphasising the need for additional training focused on caring for post-9/11 veterans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39777140PMC11706512What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.