Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

A mutual inclusion mechanism for precise boundary segmentation in medical images.

Yizhi Pan, Junyi Xin, Tianhua Yang, Siqi Li, Le-Minh Nguyen, Teeradaj Racharak, Kai Li, Guanqun Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yizhi PanSchool of Information Engineering, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Junyi XinSchool of Information Engineering, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Tianhua YangSchool of Information Engineering, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Siqi LiSchool of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan.
Le-Minh NguyenSchool of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan.
Teeradaj RacharakSchool of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Ishikawa, Japan.
Kai LiSchool of Information Engineering, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.
Guanqun SunSchool of Information Engineering, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate image segmentation is crucial in medical imaging for quantifying diseases, assessing prognosis, and evaluating treatment outcomes. However, existing methods often fall short in integrating global and local features in a meaningful way, failing to give sufficient attention to abnormal regions and boundary details in medical images. These limitations hinder the effectiveness of segmentation techniques in clinical settings. To address these issues, we propose a novel deep learning-based approach, MIPC-Net, designed for precise boundary segmentation in medical images. Methods: Our approach, inspired by radiologists' working patterns, introduces two distinct modules: 1. Mutual Inclusion of Position and Channel Attention (MIPC) Module: To improve boundary segmentation precision, we present the MIPC module. This module enhances the focus on channel information while extracting position features and vice versa, effectively enhancing the segmentation of boundaries in medical images. 2. Skip-Residue Module: To optimize the restoration of medical images, we introduce Skip-Residue, a global residual connection. This module improves the integration of the encoder and decoder by filtering out irrelevant information and recovering the most crucial information lost during the feature extraction process. Results: We evaluate the performance of MIPC-Net on three publicly accessible datasets: Synapse, ISIC2018-Task, and Segpc. The evaluation uses metrics such as the Dice coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD). Our ablation study confirms that each module contributes to the overall improvement of segmentation quality. Notably, with the integration of both modules, our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods across all metrics. Specifically, MIPC-Net achieves a 2.23 mm reduction in Hausdorff Distance on the Synapse dataset, highlighting the model's enhanced capability for precise image boundary segmentation. Conclusion: The introduction of the novel MIPC and Skip-Residue modules significantly improves feature extraction accuracy, leading to better boundary recognition in medical image segmentation tasks. Our approach demonstrates substantial improvements over existing methods, as evidenced by the results on benchmark datasets.

Indexed as

deep learningmedical image segmentationmutual inclusiontransformerU-Net

Identifiers

PMID39777107
PMCPMC11704489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.