ArticleDigital health
Prediction of acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients based on interpretable machine learning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Brain Metastasis at Initial Diagnosis in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Model Development and SHAP Interpretation Study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Early detection, risk prediction, and personalized treatment strategies.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- From black box to glass box: explainable artificial intelligence for acute kidney injury prediction-a scoping review and the GLASS-AKI translational framework proposal.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Construction of a Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Model for Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Elderly Patients.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Prediction and Causal Forest Analysis of Severe Acute Kidney Injury in ICU Patients with COPD: A MIMIC-IV Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for prognostic prediction in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable AI identifies key biomarkers for acute kidney injury prediction in the ICU.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Association between mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and mortality in ICU patients with acute kidney injury: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Validation of a cancer population derived AKI machine learning algorithm in a general critical care scenario.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Acute kidney injury (AKI) poses a lethal risk in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, where early detection is challenging. This study was to establish a prediction model for AKI 24 hours in advance for ICU patients and to help clinicians monitor patients at an early stage by key features. Methods: In this study, the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) databases were used to construct a dataset of critically ill patients. Predictive models were constructed using five machine learning algorithms based on MIMIC-IV data, and the best predictive model was selected by multiple model evaluation metrics. MIMIC-III data were used for external validation. We conducted an interpretability analysis of the model using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to clarify key features and decision-making mechanisms. Results: A total of 18,186 patient data were included in this study. The analysis combining calibration and decision curves demonstrated that the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) exhibited superior performance among the five algorithms, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88. Interpretability analysis based on the XGBoost model showed diuretic use, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, age, and antibiotic use as the most important decision factors of the model. The SHAP summary plot was used to illustrate the effects of the top 19 features attributed to the XGBoost. Conclusions: The XGBoost algorithm can predict the occurrence of AKI more accurately. Interpretative analysis of the model reveals the mechanisms of key features, and reflects the individual differences between patients, providing an important clinical reference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.