Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39777002›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2024

No prediction without prevention: A global qualitative study of attitudes toward using a prediction tool for risk of developing depression during adolescence.

Brandon A Kohrt, Syed Shabab Wahid, Katherine Ottman, Abigail Burgess, Anna Viduani, Thais Martini, Silvia Benetti, Olufisayo Momodu, Jyoti Bohara, Vibha Neupane and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Brandon A KohrtCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3829-4820
Syed Shabab WahidDepartment of Global Health, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-0537
Katherine OttmanCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Abigail BurgessSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Anna ViduaniDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Thais MartiniDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Silvia BenettiDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Olufisayo MomoduDepartment of Psychiatry, Lagos Island General Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.
Jyoti BoharaTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO Nepal), Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Vibha NeupaneTranscultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO Nepal), Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kamal GautamCenter for Global Mental Health Equity, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-9359
Abiodun AdewuyaDepartment of Behavioural Medicine, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7611-6953
Valeria MondelliDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-6839
Christian KielingDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Helen L FisherSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4174-2126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the rate of advancement in predictive psychiatry, there is a threat that it outpaces public and professional willingness for use in clinical care and public health. Prediction tools in psychiatry estimate the risk of future development of mental health conditions. Prediction tools used with young populations have the potential to reduce the worldwide burden of depression. However, little is known globally about adolescents' and other stakeholders' attitudes toward use of depression prediction tools. To address this, key informant interviews and focus group discussions were conducted in Brazil, Nepal, Nigeria and the United Kingdom with 23 adolescents, 45 parents, 47 teachers, 48 health-care practitioners and 78 other stakeholders (total sample = 241) to assess attitudes toward using a depression prediction risk calculator based on the Identifying Depression Early in Adolescence Risk Score. Three attributes were identified for an acceptable depression prediction tool: it should be understandable, confidential and actionable. Understandability includes depression literacy and differentiating between having a condition versus risk of a condition. Confidentiality concerns are disclosing risk and impeding educational and occupational opportunities. Prediction results must also be actionable through prevention services for high-risk adolescents. Six recommendations are provided to guide research on attitudes and preparedness for implementing prediction tools.

Indexed as

adolescentsdepressiondeveloping countrieshealth risk behaviorspreventive health servicesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39777002
PMCPMC11704374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.