Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39776964›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2024

How to reduce the adverse effects of weight stigma on the quality of life: a preferred reported items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA).

Guillaume Ramsamy, Helena Mosbah, Jean Pierre Faure, Vanina Plault, Marion Albouy, Catherine Esnard

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quality of Life in Adults with Eating Disorders.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guillaume RamsamyDépartement de psychologie, Université de Poitiers, Université François Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, Poitiers, UMR7295 Centre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage (CeRCA), Poitiers, France.
Helena MosbahCentre spécialisé de l'obésité, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Jean Pierre FaureCentre spécialisé de l'obésité, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Vanina PlaultDépartement de psychologie, Université de Poitiers, Université François Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, Poitiers, UMR7295 Centre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage (CeRCA), Poitiers, France.
Marion AlbouyCentre spécialisé de l'obésité, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Catherine EsnardDépartement de psychologie, Université de Poitiers, Université François Rabelais de Tours, CNRS, Poitiers, UMR7295 Centre de recherches sur la cognition et l'apprentissage (CeRCA), Poitiers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity, affecting 38% of adults globally, carries economic burdens and health risks like cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Weight-loss programs often face challenges due to stigma and poor body image, impacting individuals' quality of life. Research on interventions targeting weight stigma is lacking, emphasizing the need for comprehensive approaches addressing psychological and behavioral aspects for effective care. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched into three databases (PubMed, APA PsycArticles/PsycInfo, and Web of Science) articles published between 1975 and 2024. Studies were eligible if they involved people living with overweight or obesity who participate in a psychological program targeting, or not, weight stigma and if at least one outcome was related to weight stigma. Results: We selected 24 studies published between 2009 and 2022, the majority concerning English-speaking countries. Reduction in weight stigma was observed in 23/24 studies, particularly through cognitive-behavioral techniques (18/24 studies), while others studies emphasized individual predispositions and the need for longer, and denser interventions. Conclusion: Three relevant characteristics emerged from the studies analysed: content, duration and tools. Cognitive-behavioral techniques were central, aiding participants in managing their condition and coping with stigma. Interventions reducing Weight Bias Internalization (WBI) led to improved psychosocial determinants, yet the mechanisms remain unclear. Future research should address intervention duration, participant involvement, and the association between WBI and psychosocial factors to enhance outcomes and understanding.

Indexed as

healthinterventionobesityquality of lifeweight bias internalizationweight stigma

Identifiers

PMID39776964
PMCPMC11704426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.