ArticleGerms2024
Comparative phenotypic and proteomic analysis of colistin-exposed
Article in Germs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of colistin resistance threatens the treatment of Methods: In this study, in vitro development of colistin resistance was investigated using comparative phenotypic and proteomic analysis of Results: Colistin-exposed strains decreased susceptibility to colistin while remaining susceptible to other antibiotics. Col-E1 reduced the cell lengths by 17.67% and the colony size by 36.16% compared to the initial strain. The reduction remained in Col-E2. The pyocyanin production was reduced in Col-E1 (p=0.025, Tukey HSD) and increased again in Col-E2 (p=0.005, Tukey HSD). In contrast, no significant changes in elastase, protease, rhamnolipid, pyoverdine, and biofilm production were observed (p>0.05, Tukey HSD). In Col-E1, the proteome analysis showed 135 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) of which 94 DEPs (69.23%) maintained their expression change in Col-E2. Among DEPs, 82 were involved in metabolism and protein synthesis. Some DEPs (6/135) played a role in stress response such as GrpE (fold change: 14.93) and Hmp (fold change: 12.08). In particular, membrane proteins like OprD, DdlB, and OprI showed significant colistin response with fold change of -8.47, 6.43 and 6.19, respectively. Conclusions: In summary, colistin response in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.