ArticleGerms2024
In vivo systemic vancomycin determination from polymethyl methacrylate and morselized bone allograft used in two stage septic knee revision arthroplasty.
Article in Germs, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Renal safety of intraoperative local vancomycin powder application in orthopedic surgery: a retrospective analysis.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This paper examines the use of local antibiotic therapy in one-stage septic revision surgery for late periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This case study suggests that morselized bone allografts impregnated with antibiotics in powder form are a preferable alternative to polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) because they can generate higher local antibiotic concentrations. Current research also recommends using vancomycin and aminoglycosides as the preferred choice of antibiotics, as they may have low diffusion in tissues when administered intravenously, but are effective when administered locally. The article emphasizes the importance of achieving high local antibiotic concentrations to eradicate bacterial biofilms and provides guidelines for the preparation of bone allografts. Case report: The paper assesses the case study of a 68-year-old male patient who underwent two-stage total revision surgery for a late septic failure of the endoprosthesis (approximatively one year after implantation). The first stage involved removing the implant, debridement, lavage, and setting a fixed spacer manually made from polymethyl methacrylate impregnated with 4 g of vancomycin. The second stage of revision surgery utilized a morselized bone allograft impregnated with 4 g of vancomycin as a means of local antibiotic therapy and bone defect coverage. Systemic levels of vancomycin were measured at 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours respectively after surgery. During this period, no systemic vancomycin was administered. After the second stage was carried out and the testing was carried out, systemic vancomycin therapy was initiated and the plasma levels of the drug were assessed and subsequently therapeutic doses were adjusted. Conclusions: Vancomycin loaded bone allograft achieved higher systemic concentrations that its polymethyl methacrylate counterpart, when being manually loaded with the same amount of antibiotic. Nonetheless, the levels were well below nephrotoxic levels, indicating that this may be a valuable tool for local means of antibiotic therapy in selected patients that could not endure such a systemic therapeutic regiment. For septic revisions, antibiotic loaded bone allograft holds a valuable place in the surgical arsenal of local antimicrobial treatment, by far exceeding that of the polymethyl methacrylate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.